"Killer" Vitamin C Revisited in Media
Article adapted from VRP newsletter by Jim English.
A study published in the June issue of the journal Science reported
that lipid hydroperoxides (rancid fat molecules) can react in a
test tube with vitamin C to form products (genotoxins) that may
potentially be harmful to DNA. Although the reaction of these products
with DNA was not demonstrated, the study suggested that vitamin
C might enhance mutagenesis and increase the risk of cancer. The
fact that this conclusion is opposed by countless studies showing
vitamin C to be safe didn't stem the flow of alarming media headlines
implying that vitamin C might cause cancer.
If this sounds familiar, it is. In a letter published
in the April 9, 1998 journal Nature, British researchers claimed
that 500 mg of vitamin C daily caused damage to DNA. The media
responded with a flood of sensational stories reporting that vitamin
C caused cancer. Later, when a later study reversed the findings
and concluded that supplementation of 500 mg/day of vitamin C and
400 IU of vitamin E had "no significant main effect or interaction
effect on oxidative DNA damage," the media were not inclined to
share the revised information with the public.
Flawed Science
The Science study is already under attack for
testing conditions that don't exist in the real world. In living
cells vitamin C is the first line of antioxidant defense, acting
to prevent the formation of lipid hydroperoxides. In fact, lipid
hydroperoxides can only form when vitamin C levels are depleted.
Vitamin C also enhances the effects of vitamin E, another important
antioxidant that directly prevents the conversion of unsaturated
fats to lipid hydroperoxides.
In order to get a reaction the Science researchers
incubated vitamin C (without vitamin E) in a concentrated solution
of lipid hydroperoxides at least 10,000 times higher than any levels
ever found in human plasma. Then the Science team steeped this
concoction for a period of up to two hours. In the body, when and
if lipid hydroperoxides do occur, cellular enzymes reduce them
to harmless alcohols in a fraction of a second, leaving little
time for them to interact with vitamin C.
The conditions tested by the researchers are so
far removed from what occurs in the body that, aside from some
interesting test tube chemistry, no real conclusions about the
risks and benefits of vitamin C can be concluded from the Science
article.
Proven Benefits of Vitamin C
In contrast to the handful of alarming reports
embraced by the media, the majority of scientific studies indicate
that vitamin C is not only safe, but that it may actually help
to prevent certain types of cancer, including cancers of the stomach,
bladder and colon. Researchers from the National Institutes of
Health have become so impressed with the safety and cancer-fighting
ability of vitamin C that they have recommended raising the RDA
(Recommended Daily Allowance) for vitamin C from the current 60
mg/day to 200 mg/day. The NIH based their proposal on the growing
body of research showing that five servings a day of fruit and
vegetables high in vitamin C can help to prevent cancer.
Modern Media vs. Facts
While the Science study has little relevance for
living organisms, the manner in which the story was handled reveals
much about contemporary media. Driven by immediacy and sensationalism,
media organizations often reveal an "anti-nutrition" bias in their
uncritical acceptance of any report touting the potential dangers
of nutrients. Instead of providing balanced reporting that includes
opposing viewpoints, news outlets turn for support to a small group
of conventional doctors and scientist recognized for their unwillingness
to accept any form of proof that vitamins and minerals have health
benefits.
The natural products industry is dedicated to
providing state-of-the art nutrition that is based on the overwhelming
body of scientific data showing that dietary supplements are both
safe and effective. While supplement manufacturers are severely
restricted from making many valid health claims under Food & Drug
Administration law, the media have no such restrictions, and are
free to disseminate unfounded claims as truth. In the end it will
be up to the American public and concerned health consumers to
condemn irresponsible reporting and to demand a fair and balanced
presentation of the facts.
For complete list of references, please contact this website: info@cassmd.com
For more information on the benefits of vitamin C, go to: www.orthomed.com
|